
It appears that in recent days with the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica story breaking, Dave Morin has been “overwhelmed with requests to rebuild a better Path”. Yesterday he sent out this tweet:
Overwhelmed by requests to rebuild a better @Path. Considering doing it. If you are interested in working on such an idea, DM me. Let’s see if a passionate team forms. If so, we’ll do it.
— DAVE MORIN (@davemorin) March 22, 2018
This outpouring is surely due to the continuing fallout from the #DeleteFacebook campaign and the growing concern of our trust being compromised with regards to sharing of personal data. Dave Morin is an alumni of Facebook and was a co-founder of Path which aimed to be a much more personal social networking app. One of its founding principles was to limit the number of people you could follow on the network citing Dunbar’s number. The app originally limited you to 50 friends but later expanded that to Dunbar’s 150. [You can read the history arc of Path on TechCrunch here.]
I was an avid user of Path. While I restrained my personal sharing on Facebook due to its nature of a more open network that I also used to share professional achievements, I shared more intimate thoughts with a closed circle on Path. After Path’s sale in 2015 my usage started to dwindle and I eventually stopped using it.
I recently wrote about the importance of decentralization and it continues to pick up steam amidst continuing news about how our personal data continues to be compromised. I responded to Dave’s tweet and a short time later he responded:
Open source will never work, too complex to build these networks. Decentralized, maybe.
— DAVE MORIN (@davemorin) March 22, 2018
While I don’t understand how the complexity of such a project wouldn’t allow it to be created as open source, it was nice to see that decentralization is a consideration. In fact in a later tweet he mentioned possibly using Blockstack which confirms his thoughts.
I’m sure choosing open source would present quite a few challenges but I feel that it would ensure that a community could be built around a project to ensure its longevity. What guarantee as users would we have that this new project wouldn’t just be sold again like Path? An app as intimate with the amount of personal data we devote to it deserves our guarantee of trust and survival. The mere fact that that data has value to someone for purchasing it, removes the trust of having single entity owning it. We need to re-think the business model around such an important app. It’s time.
I guess by decentralizing it, the data could become portable to other apps but open source just seems like glue that would bind that. There are currently great business models in content management systems such as Automattic as a for profit entity building apps on top of open source WordPress as well as the same model in Acquia for Drupal. I’d love to see a similar model developed for a social network.
I responded to Dave’s tweet with the following, but haven’t gotten a response:
Ok, can I ask what your motivation is to take this on? What goals do you plan to achieve that Path wasn’t able to? Why will it be different this time? Btw, I ask these questions as someone who loved Path.
— Mark Krynsky (@krynsky) March 22, 2018
I just feel that we’re past having a private entity having ownership of something as important as a social network and there has to be a better way to create such a system that allows those who build it to make a profit while keeping the integrity and longevity of it guaranteed. I’m excited about Dave’s announcement regardless and look forward to following its progress.
In any case his original tweet has garnered quite a bit of positive interest and excitement with over 200 responses as of this writing. Here’s some additional notable ones:
Several former Path team members came out of the woodwork showing their support for building a new app. Here’s one of them.
Are we getting the band back together?
— Mike DiCarlo (@mikedicarlo) March 22, 2018
down, pretty sure @mattmatt and I can make an iOS client in a few hours now that I actually know what I am doing
— Andrew Rauh (@a_j_r) March 22, 2018
Looks like Ryan is ready and willing to help.
Can you help me put out a call for those interested in working on the team?
— DAVE MORIN (@davemorin) March 22, 2018
I like this idea and it plays into my integrity and longevity concerns
This is a great idea. Truly differentiate in more than just product.
— Brenden Mulligan (@mulligan) March 22, 2018
Looks like the first investor is lined up.
Will send docs!
— DAVE MORIN (@davemorin) March 22, 2018
Several tweets discussing a new business model. Dave says subscription only but also likes the crowdfunding or indie vc model.
Subscription only.
— DAVE MORIN (@davemorin) March 22, 2018
It would be really interesting to see a subscription model in between @Patreon and https://t.co/n3XmNcdQ0W instead of the traditional “fixed monthly fee” model
— Jorge Camargo (@jcmrgo) March 22, 2018
And finally…
It’s happening, stay tuned.
— DAVE MORIN (@davemorin) March 22, 2018